"In a slaveholding community, the white man, however poor or humble, is a member of the ruling class. He is equal to the wealthiest planter. Color, not wealth, is the mark of distinction, and the poorest white citizen feels that he belongs to an elevated caste, sharing in the dignity and privileges of the dominant race. This creates a bond of union among whites that transcends all differences of property or education, rendering our society remarkably stable..."
— Adapted from Thomas R. Dew, Review of the Debate in the Virginia Legislature, 1832
Which of the following developments during the early nineteenth century best explains the social dynamic described in the excerpt?
- AThe growth of industrial manufacturing in Southern cities, which provided high-wage factory jobs for poor white laborers.
- BThe replacement of hereditary chattel slavery with temporary indentured contracts to pacify labor unrest among poor whites.
- The creation of a shared racial identity and social hierarchy that united non-slaveholding whites with the planter elite.Answer
- DThe resolution of sectional conflicts through federal tariff reductions, which eliminated economic divisions between classes.
Answer
The creation of a shared racial identity and social hierarchy that united non-slaveholding whites with the planter elite.
The correct answer is correct because Thomas Dew's argument highlights how racial hierarchy and white supremacy created solidarity among white southerners across different economic classes. By emphasizing color over wealth as the primary mark of distinction, the planter elite fostered a shared identity that bound non-slaveholding yeoman farmers to the defense of the plantation economy and chattel slavery, even though they did not directly own slaves.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The social structure and ideological defense of slavery in the antebellum South