Patrick Henry, speech at the Virginia Ratifying Convention, 1788:
"Here is a resolution as revolutionary as the half-way house of the English revolution. The question turns on that poor little thing—the expression, 'We, the people,' instead of 'We, the states,' of America. . . . States are the characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the states be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great, consolidated, national government, of the people of all the states."
Which of the following arguments did proponents of the Constitution most commonly use to address the criticism expressed by Henry in the excerpt?
- They asserted that the new government would be a compound republic, combining both national and federal features to preserve state sovereignty.Answer
- BThey claimed that the Articles of Confederation had already established a consolidated national government, rendering Henry’s fears moot.
- CThey argued that the direct election of the president by the national electorate would ensure the executive remained accountable to the states.
- DThey advocated for a strict constructionist interpretation of federal powers to guarantee that states remained the sole source of political authority.
Answer
The correct answer states that proponents asserted the new government would be a compound republic, combining both national and federal features to preserve state sovereignty.
The correct option is correct because during the ratification debates, Federalists (most notably James Madison in Federalist No. 39) defended the Constitution against charges of consolidation by arguing that it created a novel 'compound' government. This system blended national elements (deriving power directly from the people) with federal elements (preserving the distinct existence and authority of the states), thereby maintaining a balance of shared sovereignty.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The Federalist and Anti-Federalist debates over federalism and state sovereignty during ratification
Estimated Time:2m 0s