"The assertion that the United States have a democratic mission to propagate and extend, by force if necessary, their principles and institutions over the whole of North America, is a modern invention... Your mission is to improve the state of the world, by showing the example of a government founded on justice, peace, and equal rights... If we attempt to carry it out by conquest and force, we shall adopt the very principles of the European monarchies we profess to oppose, and subvert the foundation of our own democratic institutions."
— Albert Gallatin, *Peace with Mexico*, 1847
Which of the following debates in the United States during the 1840s is most directly reflected in the excerpt?
- AThe debate over whether popular sovereignty should be used to resolve the status of slavery in new territories
- BThe dispute over whether the Monroe Doctrine justified military intervention against European powers in the Americas
- The conflict between the ideological justification for territorial expansion and the preservation of republican valuesAnswer
- DThe struggle between Northern and Southern states over the implementation of protective tariffs to fund internal improvements
Answer
The conflict between the ideological justification for territorial expansion and the preservation of republican values
The correct answer is correct because Gallatin's pamphlet directly attacks the core assumptions of Manifest Destiny—specifically, that the United States has a mission to expand its territory and systems by force. Gallatin argues that attempting to achieve democratic expansion through military conquest and coercion subverts the very foundation of American republicanism, thereby highlighting the sharp conflict between expansionist foreign policy and the preservation of domestic democratic-republican values.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The ideological debates surrounding Manifest Destiny and territorial expansion in the 1840s.
Estimated Time:2m 0s