While both influence federal policy, iron triangles and issue networks differ in their stability and membership. Which of the following is a primary distinction between an iron triangle and an issue network?
- Iron triangles consist of stable, long-term relationships among a bureaucratic agency, a congressional committee, and an interest group, whereas issue networks are temporary, fluid groups of diverse individuals and advocacy organizations focused on a specific policy issue.Answer
- BIron triangles are created by formal executive orders to advise the president, whereas issue networks are informal groups that operate entirely within the judicial branch.
- CIron triangles require members of Congress to vote as delegates based on the direct instructions of their constituents, whereas issue networks require members of Congress to act as trustees.
- DIron triangles are open to the general public and easily influenced by voter opinions, whereas issue networks are secretive relationships limited to cabinet-level executive officials.
Answer
Iron triangles consist of stable, long-term relationships among a bureaucratic agency, a congressional committee, and an interest group, whereas issue networks are temporary, fluid groups of diverse individuals and advocacy organizations focused on a specific policy issue.
The correct answer accurately states that iron triangles are defined by stable, long-term alliances among a bureaucratic agency, a congressional committee, and an interest group, whereas issue networks are temporary, shifting coalitions of various interest groups, experts, and advocates focused on a policy concern.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Differences Between Iron Triangles and Issue Networks