A student is studying how landmark Supreme Court decisions have shaped the balance of power between the national government and state governments.
| McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) | United States v. Lopez (1995) | |
|---|---|---|
| Row 1 | Declared that Congress could only exercise powers explicitly enumerated in Article I. | Declared that the federal government could regulate any activity related to public education. |
| Row 2 | Led to an expansion of federal power by validating the concept of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause. | Led to a restriction of federal power by narrowing the interpretation of the Commerce Clause. |
| Row 3 | Confirmed that states have the constitutional authority to tax federal operations under the Tenth Amendment. | Confirmed that Congress has broad power to regulate local gun possession under the Commerce Clause. |
| Row 4 | Applied the Tenth Amendment to protect state sovereignty from federal overreach. | Applied the Necessary and Proper Clause to allow federal regulation of local school zones. |
Which of the following rows in the table correctly compares the constitutional holdings and their effects on federal power for the Supreme Court cases *McCulloch v. Maryland* (1819) and *United States v. Lopez* (1995)?
- ARow 1
- Row 2Answer
- CRow 3
- DRow 4
Answer
Row 2
The correct option (Row 2) accurately compares both cases. In *McCulloch v. Maryland*, the Court established that Congress possesses implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause, expanding federal authority. Conversely, in *United States v. Lopez*, the Court restricted federal authority by ruling that the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded congressional power under the Commerce Clause.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
McCulloch v. Maryland and United States v. Lopez
Estimated Time:1m 30s