An advocacy group establishes two separate political entities: a traditional Political Action Committee (PAC) and an independent expenditure-only committee (Super PAC). Both entities wish to support a candidate running for the U.S. Senate. Under current campaign finance laws, which of the following describes a key legal difference between how these two entities can operate?
- AThe traditional PAC is prohibited from advertising under the principle of popular sovereignty, whereas the Super PAC may coordinate unlimited television ads with the candidate's campaign staff.
- BThe traditional PAC can make unlimited direct contributions to the candidate, while the Super PAC is limited to the same contribution caps as individual donors.
- The traditional PAC can donate directly to the candidate's campaign within federal limits, whereas the Super PAC is prohibited from donating directly to the candidate but can make unlimited independent expenditures.Answer
- DThe traditional PAC is protected under the elite model of democracy to coordinate unlimited spending, whereas the Super PAC must adhere to a participatory model that restricts its message to grassroots lobbying.
Answer
The traditional PAC can donate directly to the candidate's campaign within federal limits, whereas the Super PAC is prohibited from donating directly to the candidate but can make unlimited independent expenditures.
The correct option is correct because traditional PACs are permitted to make direct contributions to candidate campaigns up to federally mandated limits. In contrast, Super PACs (independent expenditure-only committees) are legally prohibited from making direct campaign contributions or coordinating their spending with candidates, but they are permitted to make unlimited independent expenditures for political speech.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The distinction between traditional PACs and Super PACs regarding contribution limits, coordination, and independent expenditures under federal law.
Estimated Time:1m 30s