In Federalist No. 51, Publius (James Madison) writes:
'In the constitution of the judiciary department in particular, it might be inexpedient to insist rigorously on the principle: first, because peculiar qualifications being essential in the members, the primary consideration ought to be to select that mode of choice which best secures these qualifications; secondly, because the permanent tenure by which the appointments are held in that department, must soon destroy all dependence on the authority conferring them.'
Which of the following statements best explains why the author believes the appointment process for the judiciary should deviate from the general separation of powers design described in the passage?
- AThe appointment process allows the president to exert long-term policy influence over the legislature through loyal judges.
- BThe appointment process ensures that judicial rulings remain aligned with the shifting political beliefs of the electorate.
- The appointment process is offset by life tenure, which prevents judges from feeling obligated to the branches that appointed them.Answer
- DThe appointment process is a power reserved to the state governments to prevent the federal judiciary from expanding.
Answer
The appointment process is offset by life tenure, which prevents judges from feeling obligated to the branches that appointed them.
The correct option explains that while executive and legislative appointment of judges deviates from the strict separation of powers, the introduction of life tenure ensures that judges are not dependent on those branches once in office.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The justification for life tenure of federal judges as an exception to the strict separation of powers, ensuring judicial independence from political influence.
Estimated Time:1m 30s