Question

Difficulty: HardQing and Russian Imperial Expansion

Source 1

"You, our administrators, must collect the *yasak* [tribute paid in furs] from the native peoples of Siberia with kindness and gentleness, and not by force or violence. But if they refuse to pay the imperial tribute, you shall use military force to bring them into submission under our sovereign hand, and build fortresses [ostrogs] to secure the land."

—Instruction from the Russian Tsarist Chancellery to Siberian administrators, 1640

Source 2

"Our dynasty has unified the Western Regions and Mongolia. We must govern these diverse peoples according to their own customs and religions. Do not force them to adopt Chinese dress or language, but instead enlist their local elites [begs and princes] to maintain order, collect taxes, and report to our officials."

—Edict of the Qianlong Emperor, Qing Dynasty, 1762

Which of the following best describes a similarity in the imperial expansion and administration methods of the Russian and Qing empires as shown in the sources?

  1. They accommodated local elites and relied on existing tribute systems to consolidate territorial control.Answer
  2. B
    They required conquered populations to culturally assimilate to the dominant language and customs of the metropolitan core.
  3. C
    They relied on private joint-stock companies and maritime commercial networks to finance and govern their frontier territories.
  4. D
    They dismantled local political structures and established direct bureaucratic administration staffed exclusively by ethnic metropolitan elites.

Answer

They accommodated local elites and relied on existing tribute systems to consolidate territorial control.
The correct answer is correct because both sources reflect how land-based empires accommodated local populations and elites (such as begs, princes, and tribal leaders) and utilized tribute collection systems (such as the yasak system in Siberia and local tax collection in Qing Central Asia) to consolidate control over diverse populations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Source 1 regarding Russian administrative instructions in Siberia.
The source instructs administrators to collect the yasak (fur tribute) using local cooperation where possible, or force if resisted, and build fortresses to secure the frontier.
To identify the specific methods of expansion and control used by the Russian Empire in Siberia.
2
Analyze Source 2 regarding the Qing Qianlong Emperor's edict for newly acquired Western Regions.
The edict directs officials to govern the regions according to local customs, avoid forcing cultural assimilation (dress or language), and use local elites (begs and princes) to collect taxes and maintain order.
To identify the specific methods of administration and control used by the Qing Empire in Central Asia.
3
Compare the methods identified in both sources to find a common administrative strategy.
Both empires utilized local tribute collection systems and collaborated with local elites/customs to administer their newly conquered territories, rather than imposing immediate cultural assimilation or direct centralized rule.
To synthesize the findings and match them to the correct option.

Key Concept

Qing and Russian imperial administration strategies, emphasizing tribute systems and collaboration with local elites.
Rate this question