“NAFTA is a death sentence for the indigenous peoples of Mexico, who are being offered up as cheap labor in the service of transnational corporations. This agreement represents the final blow to our communal lands, which have sustained us for generations, replacing our traditional corn production with cheap imports from the north.”
—Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN), Declaration from the Lacandon Jungle, 1994
Which of the following arguments against globalization is most directly supported by the passage?
- ADeveloping nations sought to return to mercantilist policies by establishing government-controlled monopolies over imported goods.
- Free-trade agreements and neoliberal policies could undermine local agricultural traditions and indigenous autonomy.Answer
- CGlobalization has succeeded in completely eliminating regional cultural identities and national borders.
- DGlobal economic integration in the late twentieth century was characterized by direct military annexation of foreign territories by multinational corporations.
Answer
Free-trade agreements and neoliberal policies could undermine local agricultural traditions and indigenous autonomy.
The correct option correctly identifies the core argument of the EZLN declaration: that free-trade policies like NAFTA threaten local agricultural practices, communal land rights, and the autonomy of indigenous communities by forcing them to compete with cheap foreign imports.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Resistance to Globalization after 1900
Estimated Time:1m 30s