Read the three brief excerpts from naval engineering field evaluations below. Which author tone or attitude correctly matches each excerpt?
- While the novel titanium-reinforced hull promises extended operating depth, the laboratory trials failed to account for repeated thermal cycling in sub-zero brine, rendering its real-world reliability questionable until long-term stress testing is completed.Skeptical and cautionary
- The newly installed autonomous sonar navigation suite performed flawlessly throughout the gale, guiding the vessel past hazardous submerged reefs with exceptional precision and saving invaluable crew hours.Appreciative and commendatory
- The dual-propulsion diesel-electric unit consumed 420 liters of standard marine fuel per nautical league at sustained cruising speed, aligning directly with baseline parameters established during prior dockyard trials.Objective and matter-of-fact
Answer
The excerpt evaluating the titanium-reinforced hull matches with 'Skeptical and cautionary'; the excerpt describing the autonomous sonar navigation suite matches with 'Appreciative and commendatory'; and the excerpt recording fuel consumption data matches with 'Objective and matter-of-fact'.
The author's tone is determined by analyzing descriptive word choices: the first excerpt uses qualifying words ('failed to account', 'questionable') to urge prudence; the second excerpt utilizes complimentary language ('flawlessly', 'exceptional', 'invaluable') to commend performance; and the third excerpt presents unembellished measurements ('consumed 420 liters', 'aligning directly') to deliver an unbiased report.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Inferring Author Tone and Attitude through Diction and Phrasing
Estimated Time:1m 30s