A local council in an Australian city proposes to rename a long-standing public park to better reflect the area's diverse history. The proposal causes a significant divide, with some residents feeling the change erases their heritage, while others believe it is a necessary step for community inclusion. In this context of high emotional tension, which of the following actions best illustrates the Australian value of 'Peaceful Disagreement'?
- AOrganising a public campaign to identify and personally shame the individuals who first suggested the name change on social media.
- Expressing a dissenting view through a formal petition and participating in a structured community forum to discuss the issue calmly.Answer
- CDemanding that the council cancel all public meetings on the topic to avoid further social tension and 'silence' the opposing side.
Answer
The correct answer is expressing a dissenting view through a formal petition and participating in a structured community forum to discuss the issue calmly.
The correct answer describes an approach that uses peaceful, democratic, and legal means to express a dissenting opinion. By using petitions and attending public forums to speak calmly, residents uphold the Australian value that people can disagree while still treating each other with respect and following the rule of law.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Peaceful Disagreement in a Democratic Society
Hints
1
Consider which action focuses on the 'process' of disagreement rather than trying to stop the conversation entirely.
2
Think about the difference between expressing a strong opinion and attacking the person who holds a different one.
3
The correct answer will involve a method that allows for debate while maintaining the safety and dignity of all community members.
Practice More
Review the section on 'Freedom of Speech' to see how it interacts with the responsibility to maintain a peaceful society.
Estimated Time:2m 0s