Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardDivision of Powers: Federal and State Responsibilities

The Australian Constitution establishes a 'division of powers' where certain authorities are shared between the Federal and State governments. If both levels of government pass valid laws on the same subject but the requirements of these laws directly conflict with one another, how is this legal inconsistency resolved?

  1. The Federal law prevails, but the State law remains valid except for the specific parts that are inconsistent with the Federal law.Answer
  2. B
    The State law is considered void in its entirety because the Federal Parliament possesses exclusive law-making authority over all matters mentioned in the Constitution.
  3. C
    The conflict must be resolved by the Governor-General, as the principle of separation of powers requires the executive branch to mediate between competing legislatures.

Answer

In the event of a conflict between valid Federal and State laws, the Federal law prevails, and the State law is only invalid to the extent that it is inconsistent with the Federal law.
Under Section 109 of the Australian Constitution, when a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth (Federal), the Commonwealth law shall prevail, and the State law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid. This means only the conflicting parts are affected, rather than the entire State law being canceled.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the power being exercised.
The matter involves 'concurrent powers' where both Federal and State governments have the right to legislate.
The Constitution allows both levels to make laws in many areas, such as taxation or marriage.
2
Apply the constitutional rule for legal conflict.
Refer to Section 109 of the Australian Constitution.
Section 109 specifically addresses what happens when State and Federal laws are inconsistent.
3
Determine the scope of invalidity.
The Federal law is supreme, but the State law is only struck down where it directly contradicts the Federal law.
The Constitution seeks to preserve as much of the State's 'residual' law-making power as possible while ensuring national uniformity.

Key Concept

Section 109 and the Supremacy of Federal Law

Hints

1
Think about Section 109 of the Constitution, which deals with 'inconsistency' between laws.
2
When two levels of government have power over the same thing, one must be the 'tie-breaker'.
3
The Federal law is the tie-breaker, but only for the specific parts that actually clash with the State law.

Practice More

Review the specific list of 'Exclusive' Federal powers (like defense and currency) versus 'Concurrent' powers (like taxation) to see where conflicts are most likely to occur.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Division of Powers: Federal and State Responsibilities

More questions from this topic