In Australia, citizens are encouraged to express their views on public policy through peaceful means. During a heated debate regarding a new local infrastructure project, a resident who strongly supports the project begins a social media campaign. This campaign involves posting the private contact details of opposing residents and urging supporters to 'personally confront' them at their homes until they change their minds. According to Australian values, why is this specific method of advocacy rejected?
- It constitutes intimidation and harassment, which are rejected as ways to influence others or resolve disagreements.Answer
- BIt is considered a form of peaceful disagreement as long as no physical injuries actually occur during the confrontations.
- CIt is an acceptable method of conflict resolution if the underlying social or environmental cause is considered just.
Answer
The advocacy method is rejected because it constitutes intimidation and harassment, which are not acceptable ways to influence people or settle disputes in Australia.
The correct answer identifies that the behavior described is a form of intimidation and harassment. Australian democratic values require that even when people feel very strongly about an issue, they must respect the safety and privacy of others and use peaceful, legal channels for advocacy.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Rejection of Violence and Intimidation
Hints
1
Think about whether 'confronting people at their homes' sounds like a peaceful discussion or an attempt to make them feel unsafe.
2
Australian values reject 'intimidation'. Does posting someone's private contact details to encourage others to pressure them fit that definition?
Practice More
Review the section on 'Mutual Respect and Tolerance' to see how it distinguishes between peaceful protest and harassment.
Estimated Time:2m 0s