A company is setting up a hybrid network connection between their on-premises database and a VPC in AWS. They require a secure connection with a minimum throughput of to replicate database logs. They provision a single AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection, but find that the throughput per tunnel does not meet their requirement. Which of the following options correctly identifies the throughput limit of a single AWS Site-to-Site VPN tunnel and the solution to scale the bandwidth?
- AA single VPN tunnel can scale dynamically to support up to of throughput by increasing the MTU size on the virtual private gateway, so no additional tunnels are necessary.
- BA single VPN tunnel is limited to due to stateful packet tracking. The company should replace all stateful Security Groups with stateless Network ACLs to allow the tunnel to scale up to .
- A single VPN tunnel is limited to a maximum throughput of . To scale the throughput, the company should establish multiple VPN tunnels to an AWS Transit Gateway and enable Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing.Answer
- DA single VPN tunnel is limited to . The company should implement Amazon Route 53 latency-based routing at the customer gateway to automatically distribute the VPN traffic across different AWS Regions.
Answer
A single VPN tunnel is limited to a maximum throughput of . To scale the throughput, the company should establish multiple VPN tunnels to an AWS Transit Gateway and enable Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing.
The correct option correctly states that each Site-to-Site VPN tunnel is limited to . To scale capacity beyond this point, multiple VPN connections can be attached to an AWS Transit Gateway. By enabling Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) routing on the Transit Gateway and the Customer Gateway, AWS can load balance packets across multiple tunnels, aggregating the overall bandwidth to meet or exceed the requirement.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
AWS Site-to-Site VPN throughput limits and Transit Gateway ECMP scaling
Estimated Time:1m 0s