A company hosts a microservices application on Amazon ECS using AWS Fargate. The ECS tasks run in private subnets and frequently pull large container images from Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR). The company notices a significant increase in their monthly bill due to NAT Gateway data processing charges. Which solution is the most cost-effective way to reduce these charges while maintaining security?
- Configure Interface VPC Endpoints for ECR, and configure a Gateway VPC Endpoint for Amazon S3. Update the route table of the private subnets to route S3 traffic through the Gateway Endpoint.Answer
- BConfigure Interface VPC Endpoints for ECR only, and allow the ECS tasks to retrieve the container image layers through the NAT Gateway.
- CConfigure Interface VPC Endpoints for both ECR and Amazon S3, and update the ECS task definitions to use the new endpoints.
- DAssign public IP addresses to the ECS tasks and route the image download traffic through an Internet Gateway instead of the NAT Gateway.
Answer
Configure Interface VPC Endpoints for ECR, and configure a Gateway VPC Endpoint for Amazon S3. Update the route table of the private subnets to route S3 traffic through the Gateway Endpoint.
The correct option is to configure Interface VPC Endpoints for ECR and a Gateway VPC Endpoint for Amazon S3. When an ECS Fargate task pulls a container image from Amazon ECR, it authenticates and downloads the image manifest via ECR APIs, and then pulls the actual container layers from Amazon S3. By using ECR Interface Endpoints, the API traffic remains private. By using an S3 Gateway Endpoint, the large image layers are pulled directly from S3 without passing through the NAT Gateway, avoiding the NAT Gateway data processing charge.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
S3 Gateway Endpoints bypass NAT Gateway charges for ECR image downloads because container layers are stored in S3.