A financial services provider hosts a latency-critical trading platform in the us-east-1 Region. The architecture consists of a high-throughput compute cluster in VPC-A that queries a key-value database cluster in VPC-B. Both VPCs are connected via an AWS Transit Gateway. The database cluster utilizes a Route 53 Private Hosted Zone (PHZ) for internal endpoint resolution, which is currently associated only with VPC-B. Compute instances in VPC-A must also communicate with the internet for market data feeds, routing all outbound traffic through a single NAT Gateway located in VPC-A's public subnet.
The platform is experiencing performance bottlenecks. Inter-VPC database traffic is capped at 5 Gbps per flow, and DNS resolution failures occur frequently during market open. Furthermore, outbound internet connectivity is vulnerable to Availability Zone outages.
Which two changes should a solutions architect implement to optimize network throughput, reduce latency, and improve availability? (Select TWO.)
- Establish a VPC Peering connection directly between VPC-A and VPC-B, configure the VPC route tables to route database traffic over the peering connection, and ensure MTU is configured for Jumbo Frames (9001 bytes) on both sides.Answer
- Associate the Route 53 Private Hosted Zone with VPC-A to resolve database endpoints locally, and deploy a NAT Gateway in each Availability Zone where the compute instances are located.Answer
- CEstablish an AWS Direct Connect connection with a Direct Connect Gateway, and configure transitive routing between VPC-A and VPC-B through the Direct Connect Gateway to bypass Transit Gateway latency.
- DRequest an AWS Support ticket to pre-warm the existing NAT Gateway to increase the packet processing limits and eliminate TCP flow bottlenecks during peak traffic.
- EAssociate the Route 53 Private Hosted Zone with the Transit Gateway subnet to allow transitive DNS resolution, and route all egress traffic through the Transit Gateway to a centralized internet gateway in VPC-B.