A shipping company is designing a disaster recovery (DR) solution for its package tracking application across two AWS Regions: us-east-1 (primary) and us-west-2 (secondary). The company requires a Recovery Point Objective (RPO) of 15 minutes and a Recovery Time Objective (RTO) of 30 minutes, while minimizing baseline infrastructure costs. The primary database must be replicated to the secondary region. Which disaster recovery strategy and Route 53 routing configuration should the solutions architect select?
- AA Backup and Restore strategy with nightly database backups copied to the secondary region, using Route 53 Latency-based routing to distribute traffic.
- A Pilot Light strategy with Amazon Aurora Global Database replicating data to the secondary region, using Route 53 Failover routing to direct user traffic during a disaster.Answer
- CA Warm Standby strategy with a fully scaled application environment running continuously in the secondary region, using Route 53 Geolocation routing to distribute traffic.
- DA Pilot Light strategy replicating database snapshots hourly, using Route 53 Private Hosted Zones to automatically route external user traffic.
Answer
The Pilot Light strategy using Amazon Aurora Global Database for replication combined with Route 53 Failover routing meets the RPO, RTO, and cost-optimization requirements.
The Pilot Light strategy with Amazon Aurora Global Database meets the 15-minute RPO requirement because Aurora Global Database replicates data across regions with latency typically under a second. The 30-minute RTO allows enough time to spin up application servers in the secondary region when a disaster is declared, while keeping compute costs minimal during normal operations. Route 53 Failover routing is the standard policy for active-passive disaster recovery configurations.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Disaster Recovery Patterns and Route 53 Routing Policies