An enterprise is planning to migrate its legacy portfolio management platform to AWS within a strict 6-month timeline. The platform consists of two main components:
1. Core Database: An Oracle Database running on IBM AIX (Power architecture) that utilizes proprietary stored procedures. Schema conversion and database engine migration to an open-source engine (such as Amazon Aurora) is estimated to take 18 months of code refactoring and validation.
2. Document Archiving Service: A legacy archival subsystem running on Windows Server 2008 R2. The vendor has gone out of business, the installation media and source code are lost, and the application requires direct attachment to a physical local SCSI tape library for writing backups.
Which two migration strategies should the solutions architect select for these components to meet the project constraints? (Select two.)
- Replatform the Core Database by migrating it to Amazon RDS for Oracle.Answer
- Retain the Document Archiving Service on-premises while establishing secure hybrid connectivity to the AWS cloud environment.Answer
- CRefactor the Core Database by converting the database engine to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL using the AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT).
- DRehost the Core Database by using AWS Application Migration Service (MGN) to replicate the IBM AIX physical servers directly to Amazon EC2 instances.
- ERehost the Document Archiving Service by using AWS Application Migration Service (MGN) to replicate the Windows Server VM to Amazon EC2 and map the physical tape library over a site-to-site VPN.