An organization is planning to restructure its Azure environment to improve resource management and governance. The IT administrator proposes the following three configurations:
* Statement 1: Place two separate Azure subscriptions under a single custom Management Group to apply a unified Azure Policy.
* Statement 2: Deploy an Azure SQL Database in the West Europe region and place it in a Resource Group that is located in the East US region.
* Statement 3: Create a Resource Group named Prod-DB-RG inside an existing Resource Group named Prod-App-RG to establish a nested parent-child relationship.
Which of these configurations are supported in Azure?
- Only Statement 1 and Statement 2Answer
- BOnly Statement 1 and Statement 3
- COnly Statement 1
- DAll three statements
Answer
Only Statement 1 and Statement 2 are supported.
The configuration described in Statement 1 is supported because Management Groups are specifically designed to organize multiple subscriptions and apply unified governance policies. The configuration described in Statement 2 is supported because resources do not need to share the same region as their parent Resource Group; the Resource Group location only determines where the metadata is stored. Statement 3 is unsupported because Azure does not permit nesting one Resource Group inside another.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Azure resource hierarchy rules including Management Groups, Subscriptions, and Resource Groups.