Question

Difficulty: MediumAzure Monitor and Log Analytics

When monitoring the internal performance metrics—such as CPU percentage and memory usage—of an individual Azure Virtual Machine, you must configure Azure Service Health to collect and display these resource-level metrics. Is this statement true or false?

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is false because Azure Monitor is used to collect and analyze resource-level performance metrics, whereas Azure Service Health provides information about the status of Azure services and regions.
The correct answer is false. Azure Monitor is the dedicated monitoring service for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments, including individual resource metrics like CPU and memory. Azure Service Health does not monitor individual resource performance; instead, it reports on the status of Azure services and regions that could affect your subscription.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the monitoring requirement.
The requirement is to collect and monitor resource-level metrics (CPU percentage and memory usage) for a specific Azure Virtual Machine.
To determine the monitoring scope and identify the correct tool designed for resource-level telemetry.
2
Compare the functions of Azure Service Health and Azure Monitor.
Azure Monitor collects performance metrics and logs from Azure resources (like VMs). Azure Service Health tracks the availability and status of Azure's global and regional services (like App Service or VMs globally in a region).
To evaluate if Azure Service Health is the correct service for the VM-specific performance monitoring task.

Key Concept

Azure Monitor vs. Azure Service Health
Rate this question