An enterprise is designing an Azure network infrastructure. The topology includes a hub virtual network named `vnet-weur-hub` () peered with a spoke virtual network named `vnet-weur-spoke1` (). An active Network Virtual Appliance (NVA) is deployed in the hub virtual network in `snet-nva` () with the private IP address .
The spoke virtual network `vnet-weur-spoke1` contains the following subnets:
* `snet-web` () hosting front-end web servers.
* `snet-db` () hosting database servers.
To inspect all inter-subnet traffic within the spoke, a network engineer associates a route table with `snet-web` containing a user-defined route (UDR) for pointing to the NVA at . However, this configuration prevents the web servers within `snet-web` from communicating with each other, breaking the application.
You need to restore communication between the web servers in `snet-web` while ensuring that all traffic from `snet-web` to `snet-db` (and any future subnets added to `vnet-weur-spoke1`) is routed through the NVA at . The design must minimize administrative overhead.
Which configuration should you add to the route table associated with `snet-web` to resolve the communication issue?
- Add a user-defined route for with the next hop type set to Virtual network.Answer
- BAdd a user-defined route for with the next hop type set to None.
- CDisable virtual network gateway route propagation on the route table.
- DRemove the route for and add a route for pointing to the NVA at .