Question

Difficulty: EasyData Redundancy and High Availability

A company plans to deploy a new application that stores user profile photos in an Azure Blob Storage account. The architecture design requires the storage solution to remain available if a single datacenter within the primary region suffers a complete outage. The design does not require replication to a secondary region, and the company wants to minimize storage costs. Which redundancy option should you recommend for the storage account?

  1. Zone-redundant storage (ZRS)Answer
  2. B
    Locally redundant storage (LRS)
  3. C
    Geo-redundant storage (GRS)
  4. D
    Read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS)

Answer

Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) is the recommended option because it replicates data synchronously across three availability zones in the primary region, protecting against datacenter outages without the cost of regional replication.
Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) replicates data synchronously across three Azure availability zones in the primary region. This ensures that the data remains available even if a single datacenter (zone) experiences a complete outage, without incurring the higher cost of geo-replication.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the availability requirement.
The storage must survive a single datacenter outage within the primary region.
To determine the minimum scope of redundancy needed (zonal vs local).
2
Identify the regional replication constraint.
Replication to a secondary region is not required.
To rule out more expensive geo-redundant options (GRS, GZRS, RA-GRS).
3
Select the option that meets both constraints at the lowest cost.
Zone-redundant storage (ZRS) meets the requirements.
ZRS replicates across availability zones within a single region, surviving datacenter failures with lower cost than geo-redundant storage.

Key Concept

Selecting the appropriate Azure storage redundancy level (LRS vs. ZRS vs. GRS) based on availability requirements and cost constraints.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question