A company is designing a disaster recovery solution for its document management application. The architect proposes using an Azure Storage account configured with Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS). The plan assumes that the application running in the secondary region can write files directly to the secondary storage endpoint during normal operations or before a failover is initiated. Why is this design proposal incorrect?
- RA-GRS only provides read access to the secondary region; write operations cannot be performed on the secondary endpoint unless a failover is initiated.Answer
- BRA-GRS supports active-active write operations to both endpoints, but the application must write to both regions simultaneously using a multi-master replication configuration.
- CRA-GRS allows write operations to the secondary region, but they must be routed through Azure Traffic Manager to sync the transactions.
- DTo enable write operations in the secondary region, the storage account must be configured with Locally Redundant Storage (LRS).
Answer
The option stating that RA-GRS only provides read access to the secondary region and write operations cannot be performed unless a failover is initiated is the correct answer.
The correct answer is correct because RA-GRS provides a read-only endpoint in the secondary region. During normal operations, write operations can only be sent to the primary region. Write access to the secondary region is only enabled after a failover occurs, which promotes the secondary region to the primary region.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS) replication and write path limitations
Estimated Time:45s