An enterprise is designing a high-throughput gaming backend in Azure. The backend consists of two main workloads:
1. A game-session matchmaking service that communicates over secure HTTP/S on port , requiring SSL/TLS termination, URL path-based routing (e.g., routing `/match/*` to a specific pool), and SQL injection protection. This service is hosted on Azure Virtual Machines.
2. A real-time game telemetry receiver that processes high-frequency custom TCP packets on port . This receiver is deployed on a separate group of Azure Virtual Machines. The VMs hosting the telemetry receiver are pre-configured with Basic SKU public IP addresses on their network interfaces to allow direct, un-load-balanced administrator access for debugging.
The solution must meet the following requirements:
- Use a single, public entry point for the matchmaking service that is highly secure and supports path-based routing.
- Load-balance the telemetry receiver traffic across the telemetry VMs while ensuring that the current debugging configuration using Basic SKU public IPs remains functional.
- Avoid configuration validation errors due to SKU mismatches.
Which two actions should you perform to implement the load balancing architecture? (Select two.)
- Deploy an Azure Application Gateway v2 with a Standard SKU public IP address to load-balance the matchmaking service.Answer
- Deploy a Basic Load Balancer to load-balance the telemetry receiver traffic on port .Answer
- CDeploy a Standard Load Balancer to load-balance the telemetry receiver traffic on port without modifying the VM IP configurations.
- DDeploy Azure Traffic Manager to load-balance the matchmaking service and manage SSL/TLS termination.
- EDeploy a Standard Load Balancer with a Basic SKU public IP to load-balance the telemetry receiver traffic.