A network administrator applies an extended IPv4 Access Control List (ACL) containing only a single rule to an interface: `access-list 100 permit tcp host 192.168.1.10 host 10.0.0.5 eq 80`. What happens when a host with IP address 192.168.1.11 attempts to send HTTP traffic to 10.0.0.5?
- The traffic is dropped because an implicit deny clause automatically denies all unmatched packets.Answer
- BThe traffic is permitted because there is no explicit deny statement configured in the ACL.
- CThe traffic is forwarded by default because ACLs only inspect source IP address 192.168.1.10.
- DThe traffic triggers a logging notification on the router before being allowed through the interface.
Answer
The traffic is dropped because an implicit deny clause automatically denies all unmatched packets.
Every Cisco IPv4 Access Control List ends with an invisible implicit deny statement (implicit deny ip any any). Because the single configured line only permits traffic from 192.168.1.10, any packet coming from 192.168.1.11 fails to match rule 1 and is dropped by the implicit deny clause.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Implicit Deny in IPv4 Access Control Lists