An administrator configures the following IPv4 extended named access control list on a Cisco IOS router and applies it inbound on interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1:
text
ip access-list extended CORP_SEC
permit tcp 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.50 eq 22
permit tcp 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 eq 80
permit tcp 10.1.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443
Which two statements accurately describe how network traffic arriving on GigabitEthernet0/0/1 will be filtered by this access control list? (Select two options.)
- ICMP echo requests from host 10.1.10.5 to host 192.168.1.50 are dropped due to the implicit deny at the end of the access list.Answer
- TCP traffic originating from host 10.1.10.20 destined to host 192.168.2.100 on port 443 is permitted through the interface.Answer
- CICMP echo requests from host 10.1.10.5 to host 192.168.1.50 are permitted because explicit TCP permit rules automatically pass diagnostic ICMP messages.
- DSSH traffic from host 10.1.10.5 to host 192.168.2.100 is permitted because the SSH rule applies to all destinations within the enterprise network.
Answer
ICMP echo requests from host 10.1.10.5 to host 192.168.1.50 are dropped due to the implicit deny at the end of the access list, and TCP traffic originating from host 10.1.10.20 destined to host 192.168.2.100 on port 443 is permitted through the interface.
The correct statements recognize both explicit matching criteria and the role of the implicit deny clause. First, ICMP packets from host 10.1.10.5 to host 192.168.1.50 are dropped because the ACL only permits TCP port 22 to that destination; unmatched ICMP packets trigger the invisible implicit deny at the end of the list. Second, TCP traffic from host 10.1.10.20 to host 192.168.2.100 on port 443 explicitly matches the third entry permitting 10.1.10.0/24 to 192.168.2.0/24 eq 443.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Extended IPv4 ACL sequential matching and implicit deny processing
Estimated Time:1m 30s