An administrator is troubleshooting OSPFv2 neighbor connectivity between Router A and Router B connected directly over a GigabitEthernet broadcast segment. Both routers are configured in OSPF Area 0.
Router A has the following operational status:
- Loopback0 interface IP: 172.16.1.1/24 (Up/Up)
- Loopback1 interface IP: 192.168.100.1/24 (Up/Up)
- GigabitEthernet0/1 interface IP: 10.1.12.1/24 (Up/Up)
- Ten minutes after the OSPF process initialized, the administrator executed `router-id 1.1.1.1` under `router ospf 1`, but did not restart the OSPF process.
- An inbound IPv4 ACL applied to GigabitEthernet0/1 permits IP unicast traffic from Router B, but drops all IP multicast traffic addressed to 224.0.0.5.
Router B has the following operational status:
- Loopback0 interface IP: 10.2.2.2/32 (Up/Up)
- GigabitEthernet0/1 interface IP: 10.1.12.2/24 (Up/Up)
- Active OSPF Router ID: 10.2.2.2
When executing `show ip ospf neighbor` on Router B, the neighbor state for Router A is listed as `INIT/ -`. However, executing `show ip ospf neighbor` on Router A displays no output.
Which statement accurately explains why Router B is in the INIT state while Router A shows no neighbor, and identifies the Router ID that Router B receives from Router A?
- Router B receives outgoing multicast Hellos from Router A containing Router ID 192.168.100.1 and moves Router A into the INIT state; Router A displays no neighbor because its inbound ACL drops Router B's multicast Hello packets.Answer
- BRouter B receives outgoing multicast Hellos from Router A containing Router ID 1.1.1.1 because the router-id command updates the active Router ID immediately, but Router A remains in DOWN state due to an Area ID mismatch.
- CRouter B receives outgoing multicast Hellos from Router A containing Router ID 172.16.1.1 because Loopback0 is preferred over Loopback1, while Router A shows no neighbor because both routers have a DR priority of 0.
- DRouter B receives outgoing multicast Hellos from Router A containing Router ID 10.1.12.1 because physical interfaces supersede loopback interfaces, but Router A fails to recognize Router B due to mismatched Hello timers.