A network administrator configures an IPv4 extended named Access Control List (ACL) on a Cisco router interface to restrict incoming traffic as follows:
text
ip access-list extended FILTER_MGMT
permit tcp 10.2.20.0 0.0.0.255 host 172.16.100.5 eq 443
permit tcp host 10.2.20.12 host 172.16.100.5 eq 22
A technician attempts to troubleshoot network connectivity by issuing a `ping` command from host to server , but all ICMP echo request packets are dropped. Which statement correctly explains why the ping traffic fails?
- The ACL ends with an invisible implicit deny statement that drops any traffic that does not match an explicit permit entry.Answer
- BCisco extended ACLs process only TCP and UDP protocols, causing ICMP packets to be dropped due to an unhandled protocol type.
- CICMP traffic is permitted by default across Cisco router interfaces unless an explicit `deny icmp any any` entry is present.
- DThe wildcard mask restricts network communication strictly to port , automatically blocking ICMP packets on host .
Answer
The ping traffic fails because all IPv4 ACLs end with an implicit deny statement that drops any traffic not matching an explicit permit rule.
In Cisco IOS IPv4 Access Control Lists (both Standard and Extended), processing occurs sequentially from top to bottom. If a packet does not match any explicit permit statement, it hits the unwritten implicit deny clause (`deny ip any any`) at the end of the ACL. Since the ACL only contains explicit permits for TCP HTTPS and SSH traffic, ICMP echo requests from host fall through to the implicit deny and are dropped.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
ACL Sequential Processing and Implicit Deny Clause