A network administrator is configuring a routed (Layer 3) EtherChannel bundle using LACP on a Cisco Catalyst switch. The administrator creates the logical interface using `interface Port-channel 10`, executes `no switchport`, and assigns an IPv4 address. Next, the administrator enters interface configuration mode for GigabitEthernet0/1, GigabitEthernet0/2, and GigabitEthernet0/3. On GigabitEthernet0/1 and GigabitEthernet0/2, the administrator issues `no switchport` followed by `channel-group 10 mode active`. However, on interface GigabitEthernet0/3, the administrator issues `channel-group 10 mode active` without first executing `no switchport`.
What is the resulting operational status of interface GigabitEthernet0/3 in the output of `show etherchannel summary`?
- It remains in an independent (I) state and fails to bundle because its Layer 2 switchport mode does not match the Layer 3 configuration of the Port-Channel.Answer
- BIt automatically converts to a routed port and bundles successfully into Port-Channel 10 upon receiving LACP negotiation frames from the neighbor switch.
- CIt bundles into Port-Channel 10 successfully, but forces the entire EtherChannel bundle into a down state due to a native VLAN mismatch.
- DIt automatically switches its negotiation mode from active to passive to reconcile the default Layer 2 switchport setting with the Port-Channel.