Match each network topology architecture to its corresponding structural design trait and traffic flow optimization behavior.
- Routed Access 3-Tier Campus ArchitectureEliminates Layer 2 loop-prevention protocols on edge uplinks by terminating VLANs at the access switch and using an interior gateway routing protocol directly to the distribution layer.
- Spine-Leaf (Clos) Data Center ArchitectureProvides predictable, single-hop latency for East-West traffic flows using a bipartite topology where switches within the same tier do not directly interconnect.
- Collapsed Core 2-Tier ArchitectureConsolidates core routing and aggregation functions into a unified switch pair to minimize physical footprint while providing high availability for smaller enterprise sites.
- Traditional Layer 2 Access 3-Tier ArchitectureExtends VLANs across access switches to distribution nodes, requiring Spanning Tree Protocol to block redundant uplinks and prevent Layer 2 loops.
Answer
Routed Access 3-Tier Campus Architecture pairs with terminating VLANs at the access switch using IGP routing. Spine-Leaf Data Center Architecture pairs with predictable single-hop latency via a bipartite non-interconnected tier design. Collapsed Core 2-Tier Architecture pairs with consolidating core routing and aggregation into a unified switch pair. Traditional Layer 2 Access 3-Tier Architecture pairs with extending VLANs across access switches requiring STP loop blocking.
Each topology pattern is accurately matched based on its architectural boundaries and operational characteristics: Routed Access eliminates STP on uplinks via Layer 3 edge routing; Spine-Leaf uses a bipartite design for consistent East-West latency; Collapsed Core combines core and aggregation layers to save cost; and Traditional Layer 2 Access relies on STP to block redundant Layer 2 uplinks.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Comparison of Enterprise Campus and Data Center Network Topology Architectures