A technician connects an external NVMe storage enclosure to a computer's USB-C port using an unbranded USB-C to USB-C cable found in an accessory drawer. Although both the enclosure and the motherboard port support USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds up to 10 Gbps, file transfers consistently cap at approximately 40 MB/s (under 480 Mbps). What is the most likely cause of this performance bottleneck?
- The cable is a USB 2.0 charging cable that lacks the internal high-speed SuperSpeed data lanes.Answer
- BThe host computer requires an active Thunderbolt 4 host controller to achieve speeds above 480 Mbps over USB-C.
- CHigh-speed video display bandwidth standards require the cable to be terminated with DB-9 serial connectors.
- DThe cable internal wiring was terminated using the T568A wiring standard instead of the T568B standard.
Answer
The cable is a USB 2.0 charging cable that lacks the internal high-speed SuperSpeed data lanes.
The USB Type-C connector is a physical form factor. Cables manufactured primarily for device charging frequently omit the SuperSpeed differential signal pairs needed for USB 3.x, falling back to legacy USB 2.0 data throughput (~480 Mbps / ~40 MB/s real-world).
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Physical USB-C Form Factor vs. Underlying Cable Protocol Capabilities