A system administrator notices severe write latency on a database server containing a four-disk NVMe RAID 10 array. The hardware RAID controller utility indicates that the array status is currently Degraded after Disk 2 failed S.M.A.R.T. health checks and was automatically marked offline. No hot spare is currently assigned to the array. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate action to restore redundancy and optimal array performance without data loss?
- Replace Disk 2 with a functional NVMe drive of equal or greater capacity and initiate a rebuild of the degraded array.Answer
- BFormat all functional drives in the RAID 10 array using disk management to clear corrupted metadata before re-adding Disk 2.
- CRe-initialize the RAID 10 configuration from the controller BIOS and restore the system volume from the latest offsite backup.
- DPerform a low-level format on Disk 2 and force the array controller to bring the drive back online into the active set.
Answer
The correct action is to replace the failed NVMe disk with a new disk of equal or greater capacity and initiate an array rebuild through the storage controller interface.
In a RAID 10 configuration, data is striped across mirrored pairs. When a single disk fails S.M.A.R.T. checks, the controller marks it offline, leaving its mirror partner to handle all read/write operations (causing degraded write latency). Replacing the failed drive with a healthy drive of equal or greater capacity allows the controller to rebuild the mirror relationship without taking down the volume or losing data.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
RAID 10 Degraded State Recovery