A field technician is inspecting a desktop workstation that fails to complete POST following a memory upgrade. When powered on, the power LED turns solid, system fans spin continuously at maximum speed, and the motherboard emits a repeating pattern of three short beeps with no display output. The user mentions forcing a 260-pin SO-DIMM module into the expansion slot because it was listed as high-performance DDR4 RAM online. Which of the following best identifies the root cause of this system failure?
- The 260-pin SO-DIMM module is physically and electrically incompatible with standard desktop motherboard slots, which require 288-pin DIMM modules.Answer
- BThe POST beep sequence indicates corrupted BIOS/UEFI firmware that must be re-flashed before system RAM can be initialized.
- CThe laptop display inverter has suffered an electrical short, causing the system motherboard to halt boot operations during power-on initialization.
- DThe installed memory module was configured in single-channel orientation rather than alternating dual-channel motherboard slots.
Answer
The 260-pin SO-DIMM module is physically and electrically incompatible with standard desktop motherboard slots, which require 288-pin DIMM modules.
The correct answer highlights the form-factor mismatch between standard desktop motherboard DIMM slots (288 pins) and mobile SO-DIMM memory modules (260 pins). Because the pins and physical alignment key do not match, the motherboard memory controller cannot detect valid RAM, prompting the BIOS/UEFI to halt POST and emit a series of memory-error beep codes.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
RAM Form Factors and POST Error Diagnostics