An enterprise systems auditor is conducting a compliance review of closed high-priority incident tickets within an organization's IT Service Management (ITSM) platform. The audit reveals several records where core service outages were marked as resolved, yet the ticket entries lack specific hardware identification numbers, comprehensive root-cause analysis, and documented confirmation of restoration from affected department leads. Which of the following operational ticketing workflow requirements MUST be enforced to establish a compliant resolution record and maintain configuration management database (CMDB) integrity?
- Mandate that ticket resolution entries record specific asset tag identification, itemized work logs detailing the root cause and remedy, and verified confirmation of service restoration prior to final closure.Answer
- BPermit technicians to close infrastructure tickets immediately upon applying a temporary workaround, omitting individual hardware asset tags as long as the affected network subnet is documented.
- CConfigure the ITSM platform to automatically transition all unresolved high-priority tickets to a closed status after 48 hours to preserve service level agreement (SLA) compliance metrics.
- DRequire technicians to generate a new ticket for each diagnostic command executed during troubleshooting and cross-reference the new ticket numbers in the master incident record.
Answer
Mandate that ticket resolution entries record specific asset tag identification, itemized work logs detailing the root cause and remedy, and verified confirmation of service restoration prior to final closure.
Enforcing mandatory entry of unique asset tags, detailed work notes describing the root cause and final remedy, and formal resolution verification ensures compliance with enterprise documentation standards and maintains proper CMDB data integrity.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Incident Documentation and Ticket Resolution Lifecycle