An IT technician is preparing to decommission an enterprise storage system containing magnetic backup tapes, traditional magnetic Hard Disk Drives (HDDs), and Solid-State Drives (SSDs). The organization plans to refurbish and resell the SSDs, while the magnetic tapes and HDDs will be rendered completely unreadable before physical disposal. Which TWO of the following statements represent proper data destruction or sanitization practices for these media types?
- Degaussing is effective for rendering data unrecoverable on magnetic tapes and HDDs, but it is ineffective for sanitizing SSDs.Answer
- Performing an ATA Secure Erase or cryptographic erase is an appropriate sanitization method for SSDs intended for resale.Answer
- CPassing the SSDs through a high-powered degaussing wand guarantees complete data destruction prior to resale.
- DExecuting a standard high-level partition format in the operating system permanently purges sensitive data from magnetic HDDs.
Answer
The correct practices are using degaussing for magnetic media (tapes and HDDs) while recognizing its ineffectiveness on SSDs, and executing an ATA Secure Erase or cryptographic erase on SSDs intended for resale.
Degaussing is effective exclusively for magnetic media such as magnetic tapes and traditional hard drives because it disrupts magnetic alignment. Solid-state drives use non-magnetic NAND flash storage, making degaussing ineffective. For SSDs planned for resale, methods such as ATA Secure Erase or cryptographic erase sanitize all NAND cells while maintaining drive usability.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Selecting appropriate data sanitization and destruction techniques based on storage media architecture (magnetic vs. flash) and hardware disposition goals.