A network technician is investigating performance degradation on a desktop host connected to switch port FastEthernet 0/12. The switch port speed and duplex settings were manually configured to 100 Mbps and Full Duplex, while the desktop network adapter was left on auto-negotiation. Running the `show interface fastEthernet 0/12` command reveals a rapidly incrementing counter for late collisions and Frame Check Sequence (FCS) errors.
Which of the following is the root cause of this connectivity issue?
- A duplex mismatch caused by the desktop adapter auto-negotiating to Half Duplex while the switch port is fixed at Full Duplex.Answer
- BA native VLAN mismatch causing untagged traffic from the desktop to be dropped by the switch port.
- CA VLAN isolation issue where the host and switch port belong to different broadcast domains without a Layer 3 router.
- DSpanning Tree Protocol continuously blocking port FastEthernet 0/12 due to an STP root bridge priority election.
Answer
The root cause is a duplex mismatch resulting from the host network adapter auto-negotiating to Half Duplex while the switch interface is manually hardcoded to Full Duplex.
The correct answer identifies a duplex mismatch caused by mismatched negotiation modes. Standard IEEE auto-negotiation rules state that if one endpoint is manually set to fixed speed and duplex (e.g. 100/Full) and the other is set to auto-negotiate, the auto-negotiating side can sense speed but cannot detect duplex mode, defaulting to Half Duplex. The resulting collision domain mismatch causes late collisions and FCS errors on the switch interface.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Duplex Mismatch Diagnosis and IEEE Auto-Negotiation Fallback Rules