A network engineer is troubleshooting high latency and packet retransmissions in a densely populated multi-tenant office building. A site survey reveals that four adjacent enterprise access points (APs) in the 5 GHz spectrum were all configured with 80 MHz channel bonding using channels 36, 40, 44, and 48 (UNII-1 band). Because these four 20 MHz sub-channels comprise a single 80 MHz bonded channel, all four access points are competing for the exact same frequency space. Which of the following channel management strategies should the engineer implement to eliminate co-channel interference while maintaining distinct, non-overlapping channels for each access point?
- Reduce the channel width of each access point from 80 MHz to 20 MHz and assign distinct channels 36, 40, 44, and 48 across the four access points.Answer
- BMigrate all four access points to the 2.4 GHz band and assign them to channels 2, 5, 8, and 11 respectively.
- CIncrease the channel width to 160 MHz across all four access points to provide extra throughput capacity for heavy traffic.
- DMaintain the 80 MHz channel width on channel 36 and increase the power output on all access points to override background noise.
Answer
Reduce the channel width of each access point from 80 MHz to 20 MHz and assign distinct channels 36, 40, 44, and 48 across the four access points.
Reducing the channel width from 80 MHz to 20 MHz separates the single wide channel into four independent, non-overlapping 20 MHz channels (36, 40, 44, and 48). Assigning one distinct 20 MHz channel to each access point completely eliminates co-channel interference (CCI) and resolves contention issues.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
5 GHz Channel Bonding and Co-Channel Interference Mitigation