Question

Difficulty: MediumNetwork Performance Monitoring and Metrics

A network operations center team notices periodic bandwidth spikes on a branch office WAN router interface. While SNMP counter polling indicates overall interface throughput, it fails to reveal which internal endpoints or protocols are responsible for the spikes. Which network performance telemetry technology should be implemented on the router interface to capture per-flow traffic details, including source and destination IP addresses?

  1. IPFIX (IP Flow Information Export) flow telemetryAnswer
  2. B
    SNMPv3 MIB queries using the authPriv security level
  3. C
    Syslog event logging using UDP transport
  4. D
    Active ICMP jitter SLA probing

Answer

IPFIX (IP Flow Information Export) flow telemetry is the correct choice because it exports granular flow data (including source/destination IP addresses, port numbers, and byte counts) required to identify specific endpoints and applications causing traffic spikes.
IPFIX (IP Flow Information Export) provides flow-level granularity by summarizing packet streams based on key fields (source IP, destination IP, source port, destination port, and protocol). This allows network engineers to identify top talkers and specific application usage during throughput anomalies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the monitoring requirement
The requirement demands tracking granular per-flow traffic details (source/destination IP addresses and application protocols) rather than aggregate interface bandwidth.
SNMP interface counters only show total byte/packet counts passing through an interface over time.
2
Evaluate candidate telemetry technologies
IPFIX/NetFlow extracts key fields from packet headers to build flow records containing IP addresses, ports, and protocols.
Flow telemetry specifically addresses the visibility gap between overall interface utilization and per-host activity.

Key Concept

Flow-Based Telemetry vs. Device State/Metric Monitoring
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question