A network security team is transitioning from a passive out-of-band Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) TAP interface to an active in-band Network Intrusion Prevention System (NIPS) on an enterprise perimeter connection. Which of the following represent key operational advantages or trade-offs specific to deploying an inline NIPS compared to a passive NIDS? (Select TWO.)
- An inline NIPS can drop malicious packets in real time before they reach their destination host.Answer
- An inline NIPS introduces potential latency and can become a single point of failure if bypass mechanisms fail.Answer
- CAn inline NIPS processes duplicated frame copies without adding processing delay or risking network interruption.
- DAn inline NIPS eliminates the need for signature updates because in-band placement inherently decrypts TLS traffic.
Answer
The correct statements are that an inline NIPS can drop malicious packets in real time before reaching the destination, and that in-band placement introduces potential latency and single-point-of-failure risks if bypass hardware is absent.
Deploying an Intrusion Prevention System in-band (inline) means all packets flow through the device. This allows the system to actively prevent attacks by dropping malicious packets in real time. However, because it sits directly in the communication path, it adds packet processing latency and creates a potential single point of failure if the device crashes or lacks bypass capabilities.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Inline NIPS vs Passive NIDS Operational Trade-offs