A network engineer is investigating an inter-switch trunk link issue between Switch-A and Switch-B. Console logs on Switch-A continuously report "%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet0/1 (50), with Switch-B GigabitEthernet0/1 (10)". Furthermore, hosts assigned to VLAN 50 on Switch-A are unable to reach services on VLAN 50 connected to Switch-B, and frame traffic is leaking into VLAN 10. Which TWO configuration actions must be performed to restore proper Layer 2 trunking and isolation? (Select TWO.)
- Reconfigure GigabitEthernet0/1 on Switch-B so its native VLAN setting matches VLAN 50 on Switch-A.Answer
- Ensure VLAN 50 is explicitly included in the allowed VLAN list on GigabitEthernet0/1 on both switches.Answer
- CSet the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) priority to 0 on Switch-A for VLAN 50 to force root bridge election.
- DConfigure both GigabitEthernet0/1 interfaces to manual 100 Mbps half-duplex operation to clear frame tagging mismatches.
Answer
To resolve the inter-switch trunking and isolation failures, the administrator must align the native VLAN setting on Switch-B to VLAN 50 to match Switch-A, and ensure VLAN 50 is added to the allowed VLAN list on both trunk ports.
The correct actions are aligning the native VLAN ID across both ends of the 802.1Q trunk link and ensuring that VLAN 50 is included in the allowed VLAN list on both switchports. A native VLAN mismatch causes untagged frames sent from Switch-A on VLAN 50 to be received on Switch-B and placed into VLAN 10, resulting in security leakage and cross-VLAN communication failures. Additionally, VLAN 50 must be permitted on the trunk allowed list for traffic to successfully traverse between switches.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
802.1Q Trunking Native VLAN and Allowed List Troubleshooting