A network administrator is reviewing dynamic routing protocol operational characteristics during an enterprise network redesign. Which of the following statements correctly compare link-state and distance-vector routing protocols? (Select TWO.)
- Link-state protocols maintain a full network topology map by exchanging link-state updates, whereas distance-vector protocols pass full or partial routing tables only to directly connected neighbors.Answer
- BDistance-vector protocols operate strictly at Layer 2 to evaluate physical frame delivery, whereas link-state protocols operate strictly at Layer 4 by mapping TCP port connections.
- Link-state protocols typically achieve faster network convergence than distance-vector protocols because each router independently computes optimal paths using Dijkstra's Shortest Path First algorithm.Answer
- DDistance-vector protocols require Port Address Translation (PAT) to multiplex routing update packets across single public IP addresses at every hop.
Answer
Link-state protocols maintain a full network topology map by exchanging link-state updates while distance-vector protocols pass routing information only to directly connected neighbors, and link-state protocols converge faster because routers independently run Dijkstra's algorithm.
Link-state protocols (e.g., OSPF) exchange link status information to build a comprehensive map of the entire network topology and run Dijkstra's algorithm to converge rapidly when link states change. Distance-vector protocols (e.g., RIP) exchange routing tables directly with connected neighbors and process updates sequentially, resulting in slower convergence.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Link-State vs. Distance-Vector Dynamic Routing Characteristics