A network security team needs to implement intrusion monitoring across a high-throughput enterprise core switch link carrying latency-sensitive voice and transactional traffic. The security policy mandates that the monitoring deployment must not introduce latency, perform inline packet modification, or risk creating a single point of network failure if the monitoring service fails. Which deployment architecture and system type best meets these requirements?
- A Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) deployed out-of-band using a switch SPAN/mirror portAnswer
- BA Network Intrusion Prevention System (NIPS) deployed in-band with active inline packet dropping
- CA Host-based Intrusion Detection System (HIDS) installed directly on core layer switch control planes
- DA stateless network Access Control List (ACL) configured on the core distribution routers
Answer
A Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) deployed out-of-band using a switch SPAN/mirror port
The option specifying a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) deployed out-of-band using a switch SPAN or mirror port is correct because out-of-band passive deployments inspect duplicate copies of network packets. This architecture guarantees that monitoring operations do not introduce serialization latency into live real-time streams and ensures that a failure of the NIDS sensor will not disrupt production network traffic.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Passive Out-of-Band NIDS vs Inline NIPS Placement
Estimated Time:1m 30s