A network administrator is investigating reports of intermittent data backup failures across a core router interface. Although 5-minute average polling shows link utilization peaks at only 65%, interface statistics report a high count of egress packet drops during peak backup windows. The administrator needs to implement a telemetry and polling solution to capture short burst congestion while ensuring secure remote monitoring. Which of the following approaches best addresses this requirement?
- Configure flow telemetry (IPFIX/NetFlow) combined with SNMPv3 using authPriv to monitor fine-grained traffic flows and encrypted interface metrics.Answer
- BDeploy SNMPv1 polling with read-only community strings to reduce encryption processing overhead on the router during high-traffic bursts.
- CReconfigure real-time flow telemetry exporters to use TCP instead of UDP to ensure that dropped flow records are retransmitted during buffer congestion.
- DRedirect sFlow telemetry export streams to standard SNMP trap port 162 so the monitoring server consolidates traps and flow data under a single port listener.
Answer
Configure flow telemetry (IPFIX/NetFlow) combined with SNMPv3 using authPriv to monitor fine-grained traffic flows and encrypted interface metrics.
Combining flow telemetry (IPFIX/NetFlow) with SNMPv3 (authPriv) provides both high-resolution visibility into traffic microbursts causing buffer drops and secure, encrypted management polling for interface statistics.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Network Telemetry and SNMP Security Levels
Estimated Time:1m 30s