An enterprise network team prepares to update the operating system across central distribution switches to patch a critical security flaw. The lead engineer submits a formal Request for Change (RFC) to the Change Advisory Board (CAB). After evaluating the submission, the CAB rejects the RFC. Which of the following omissions in the RFC is the most likely reason for the board's rejection?
- The RFC did not contain a validated rollback procedure and specific performance metrics for triggering a change reversion.Answer
- BThe RFC omitted a plan to conduct initial software deployment directly on live production switches during business hours.
- CThe RFC scheduled the update window during maximum network utilization to guarantee high staff availability.
- DThe RFC failed to include replacement commands for physical interface cabling during the switch operating system patch.
Answer
The RFC did not contain a validated rollback procedure and specific performance metrics for triggering a change reversion.
The correct answer highlights the necessity of a fully documented rollback plan and clear abort triggers within an RFC. A primary responsibility of the Change Advisory Board is risk management; any RFC lacking a clear, tested backout strategy for reverting to a functional baseline upon failure will be rejected.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Request for Change (RFC) Requirements and Rollback Planning