A network security technician is analyzing packet captures from an enterprise user segment after host traffic was unexpectedly intercepted. The packet capture shows multiple unsolicited ARP responses associating the default gateway's IP address with an unauthorized host's MAC address. Which of the following options correctly identify the mechanism behind this incident and an effective defense? (Select TWO.)
- The underlying mechanism relies on sending spoofed gratuitous ARP frames to corrupt local MAC-to-IP translation tables.Answer
- BThe attacker is executing a DNS cache poisoning attack by injecting malicious name resolution records into the local DNS server.
- Configuring Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) on Layer 2 switchports will validate ARP packets against trusted DHCP bindings.Answer
- DDeploying a DHCP relay agent on the router interface will inspect frame headers and prevent local MAC address spoofing.
Answer
The attack mechanism involves spoofing gratuitous ARP frames to alter host MAC-to-IP tables, and the effective defense is implementing Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) on access switch ports.
Unsolicited ARP replies linking a gateway IP to an attacker's MAC address indicate ARP poisoning. Spoofed gratuitous ARP frames corrupt local ARP tables to intercept network traffic. Implementing Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) on Layer 2 switches mitigates this vector by validating ARP responses against the DHCP snooping table.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Poisoning and Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI)