Following a workstation compromise, an enterprise security team observes that an internal database server receives encrypted command-and-control traffic, accompanied by unauthorized local process injection and file integrity alterations. The existing network-based IDS connected via a switch SPAN port failed to decrypt the payload and was structurally incapable of stopping the local system modifications due to its passive out-of-band placement. To actively block unauthorized system calls, memory manipulation, and malicious file modifications directly on the server host, which security technology should be deployed?
- Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS)Answer
- BNetwork-based Intrusion Prevention System (NIPS)
- CPassive Network-based Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) with TAP mirroring
- DStateless Access Control List (ACL) on the default gateway switch
Answer
Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) should be deployed because it runs locally on the host to monitor and actively block unauthorized system calls, file modifications, and process injections.
A Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) is installed directly on host endpoints (such as servers). Because it runs within the operating system, it has complete visibility into decrypted data, file system alterations, registry modifications, and kernel/system calls. Furthermore, as a prevention system, it actively interrupts and blocks unauthorized or anomalous process execution and system calls before damage occurs.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) vs. Network-based Security Placement
Estimated Time:2m 0s