A network technician is troubleshooting name resolution issues on a Linux client system. The client can successfully reach internal resources by IP address, but system applications fail to resolve the hostname `app.lab.internal`.
The technician executes a targeted query using `dig` and receives the following output:
$ dig @172.16.0.10 app.lab.internal A
; <<>> DiG 9.16.1-Ubuntu <<>> @172.16.0.10 app.lab.internal A
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41258
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;app.lab.internal. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
app.lab.internal. 3600 IN A 172.16.50.25
Despite the direct query returning a valid record from `172.16.0.10`, standard system tools and web browsers on the workstation still fail to resolve `app.lab.internal`. Which of the following potential root causes could explain this behavior? (Select TWO.)
- The local system resolver configuration file (`/etc/resolv.conf`) is pointing to a different DNS server instead of `172.16.0.10`.Answer
- An incorrect static entry for `app.lab.internal` exists in the client's local `/etc/hosts` file.Answer
- CThe DNS server at `172.16.0.10` lacks an authoritative A record for `app.lab.internal`.
- DUDP port 53 traffic is blocked by a network firewall between the workstation and `172.16.0.10`.