A network engineer configures two Layer 3 switches, Switch-1 and Switch-2, with Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) to provide default gateway redundancy for a server VLAN (). Switch-1 is configured with a VRRP priority of 110 and a physical SVI address of . Switch-2 has a priority of 100 and a physical SVI address of . The VRRP Virtual IP (VIP) is assigned as . After a network maintenance reboot, end-user servers lose connectivity to external subnets whenever Switch-1 undergoes maintenance, despite Switch-2 being fully operational. Troubleshooting reveals that all servers were manually statically configured with as their default gateway. Which of the following best explains why gateway redundancy failed and identifies the correct solution?
- The servers were configured with the physical IP address of Switch-1 rather than the VRRP Virtual IP address; updating host default gateway configurations to will resolve the issue.Answer
- BSwitch-2 requires a higher numerical STP bridge priority value than Switch-1 to allow VRRP state transitions; lowering Switch-1's priority below Switch-2 will resolve the issue.
- CThe VRRP Virtual IP address must match the physical interface address of Switch-2 to permit master takeover; reassigning the VIP to will restore gateway redundancy.
- DVRRP preemption was automatically disabled on Switch-1 during reboot; re-enabling preemption on Switch-1 will force Switch-2 to process traffic when Switch-1 goes offline.