An enterprise security administrator is establishing a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) key lifecycle policy for employee S/MIME email certificates. The policy specifies that private keys associated with email encryption certificates must be backed up to a key escrow agent, whereas private keys associated with digital signature certificates are strictly prohibited from key escrow. Which of the following best explains the security rationale for prohibiting key escrow on digital signature private keys?
- Escrowing signature private keys violates non-repudiation because authorized escrow administrators could technically forge a user's digital signature.Answer
- BEscrowing signature private keys prevents receiving clients from validating message integrity using hashing algorithms.
- CSignature private keys must be generated directly by the Certificate Authority during the Certificate Signing Request lifecycle rather than locally.
- DDigital signatures rely exclusively on symmetric encryption algorithms, which are mathematically incompatible with asymmetric key escrow vaults.
Answer
Escrowing signature private keys violates non-repudiation because authorized escrow administrators could technically forge a user's digital signature.
Digital signatures guarantee non-repudiation, which requires sole control over the signing private key. Archiving or escrowing a signature private key means another party (such as a system administrator or key recovery agent) could potentially use that key to sign documents or emails, thereby destroying the legal proof of non-repudiation.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Key Escrow vs. Non-Repudiation in PKI Dual-Key Management