A security engineer is hardening an internal enterprise environment following an incident where an adversary established initial access on an administrative endpoint, extracted LSASS memory credentials, and executed lateral movement using unencrypted Server Message Block (SMB) sessions across internal network segments. Which TWO of the following enterprise host hardening strategies would most effectively mitigate these lateral movement techniques?
- Enforce SMB signing and encryption via baseline policies while disabling legacy SMB dialects across all host endpoints.Answer
- Enable hypervisor-protected code integrity (HVCI) and Windows Defender Credential Guard on all administrative workstations.Answer
- CDeploy an inline deception honeypot sensor on internal VLAN switches to drop unauthorized SMB session requests.
- DReconfigure perimeter firewalls to block port 445 on external-facing internet interfaces.
Answer
The two effective mitigation strategies are enforcing SMB signing and encryption while disabling legacy protocols, and enabling virtualization-based security controls such as Credential Guard and HVCI on administrative endpoints.
To mitigate memory-based credential harvesting and internal SMB session exploitation, organizations must harden individual hosts. Virtualization-based security mechanisms like Credential Guard protect sensitive LSASS memory from extraction tools, while mandatory SMB signing and session encryption ensure that internal network communications are verified and protected from tampering or interception.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Enterprise Host Hardening and Zero Trust Host Mitigations